New Teaching Standards Are Far from Teaching to the Test
Filed under: Learning Objectives, Technology Integration on Saturday, June 25th, 2011 by nacook | No CommentsThe Common Core Standards are woven into so many educational conversations lately. All teachers need to familiarize themselves with what this means. This is a challenge as they also continue to plan, teach, assess, and modify their plans throughout the school year. We need to find ways to help them synthesize all these new documents and make connections to the good teaching and learning that already goes on in so many classrooms all over the country.
I used wordle to analyze the text of the New York State Teaching Standards. I removed these common words to get a better idea of the content: learning, teacher(s), student(s), instruction(al), professional, element, and performance indicators. Each standard was broken down into elements and performance standards, so those words appeared frequently as well as the other obvious words which would be used in any document about teaching and learning.
What is left shows which words are used most often. This gives us an idea of their importance. Several concepts are repeated throughout the document. Many of them are related to comprehensive lesson design, differentiated instruction and technology integration.
Comprehensive lesson design focused on student understanding (Understanding by Design, Wiggins and McTighe) would help teachers weave together most of the important concepts such as the demonstration of knowledge and understanding, the use of a variety of research-based strategies, formative and summative assessment, and providing clear learning goals with appropriate feedback.
Differentiated instruction can also become a major part of a comprehensive lesson design. This includes concepts such as meeting diverse learning needs, providing a variety of learning opportunities, adjusting instruction based on student needs, multiple perspectives, and providing appropriate challenge with high expectations.
The integration of technology can help teachers engage students in a variety of ways to match their learning styles, interests, and readiness levels. Through technology, teachers can provide timely feedback and measure progress toward the learning goals.
In addition, technology can provide access to multiple perspectives and give students opportunities for self-directed learning involving problem solving. Both critical and creative thinking can be developed through the use of technology as well as students analyze the relevance and authenticity of information and synthesize their knowledge and understanding in creative products.
One may notice that a traditional state test is far removed from these concepts. So teaching “to the test” will not suffice. How will the states monitor these worthy standards instead of promoting a focus on these test scores?

